Skip to content
PromotEdge International

Home Guides Facebook ads vs Google Ads

Guides · Comparison

Facebook ads vs Google Ads: which one for your business?

Facebook and Google are the two largest ad platforms most businesses will consider, and they work in opposite directions. Google shows ads to people who type a need into a search box; Facebook and Instagram show ads to people who match a profile while they scroll. That difference decides cost, lead quality and what the ads must do. This guide compares the two with public benchmarks and says which to start with. It is part of our guide to paid social strategy.

Reviewed by Shivanand MishraUpdated 12 Nov 20264 min read

The short answer

Should I use Facebook ads or Google Ads?

Use Google Ads when people already search for what you sell, because search ads capture existing demand at the moment of intent. Use Facebook (Meta) ads when they do not search for it yet, or when the product sells on sight, because social ads create demand by showing it to the right people. Public benchmarks show Facebook clicks and leads cost less, while Google leads arrive with more intent; most businesses with budget for both run search first and social alongside.

Key takeaways
  • Google Ads captures demand people already have; Facebook ads create demand people did not know they had.
  • Facebook is cheaper per click and per lead in public benchmarks: WordStream's 2025 median Facebook lead cost $27.66, against $66.69 for search ads in its 2026 search report.
  • Search leads usually arrive with more intent, so compare cost per qualified lead from your CRM, not cost per lead.
  • Google rewards relevant ads and landing pages through Quality Score; Meta's auction weighs estimated action rates and ad quality.
  • Start with search if buyers search for your product; with social if they do not, or if the product sells on sight.

Need this done for your business? A person reads every message and replies.

Ask for a call back

Facebook ads vs Google Ads at a glance

Public benchmark figures beside the main working differences. Benchmarks are sourced; the rest is our own working guide.

Facebook: WordStream by LocaliQ, Facebook ads benchmarks 2025 (US lead campaigns, Apr 2024 to Jun 2025, medians). Search: WordStream by LocaliQ search benchmarks via Search Engine Journal (Google and Microsoft Ads, Apr 2025 to Mar 2026, averages).
PointFacebook (Meta) adsGoogle search ads
IntentCreates demand while people scrollCaptures demand when people search
TargetingThe person: interests, behavior, listsThe search: keywords, location, time
Click-through rate2.59% (lead campaigns)6.64%
Cost per click$1.92 (lead campaigns)$5.42
Conversion rate7.72%8.18%
Cost per lead$27.66$66.69
What does most of the workCreative and audienceKeyword and landing page

Google Ads captures people already searching for what you sell; Facebook ads reach people who match your buyer but are not searching. Facebook clicks and leads cost less in public benchmarks, while search leads tend to carry more intent. Start with search if buyers search for your product, with social if they do not, and compare both on cost per qualified lead.

The core difference: intent

A Google search ad answers a question someone just asked: "emergency plumber near me", "ERP software for manufacturers". The intent is already there, and the ad competes to catch it. A Facebook or Instagram ad appears while someone scrolls, chosen because they match an audience you defined. Nobody asked; the ad has to create interest. Search is demand capture, social is demand creation, and most of the other differences follow from that.

Cost: what public benchmarks show

WordStream by LocaliQ's Facebook ads benchmarks (last updated 14 September 2026) studied US campaigns from April 2024 to June 2025 and reports medians. Traffic campaigns (554 campaigns) had a click-through rate of 1.71% and a cost per click of $0.70. Lead campaigns (726 campaigns) had a click-through rate of 2.59%, a cost per click of $1.92, a conversion rate of 7.72% and a cost per lead of $27.66.

For search, Search Engine Journal's summary (updated 16 June 2026) of WordStream by LocaliQ's 10th search advertising benchmarks, covering Google Ads and Microsoft Ads campaigns in 20 industries from April 2025 to March 2026, gives averages of a 6.64% click-through rate, a $5.42 cost per click, an 8.18% conversion rate and a $66.69 cost per lead.

The two sets cover different periods and campaign types, so read them as a rough comparison: a search lead cost about two and a half times a Facebook lead in these reports. What matters is cost per qualified lead, measured in your own CRM.

Targeting

Google targets the search: keywords, location, device and time, with audience layers on top. Facebook targets the person: interests, behavior, location, customer lists and lookalikes of your customers, where allowed. Pew Research Center's social media fact sheet (19 October 2026) puts Facebook at 70% of US adults and Instagram at 51%, so the reach is there; the work is choosing who sees the ad.

What wins the auction

Both platforms reward relevance as well as bids. Google counts landing page experience in Quality Score, naming relevant and original content, transparency, ease of navigation, and loading speed and mobile friendliness among the factors. Meta's ad auction combines the bid with estimated action rates and ad quality, so a more relevant ad can beat a higher bid. On Google the keyword and the landing page do most of the work; on Meta, the creative does.

Creative

Search ads are text that must match the query and promise what the landing page delivers. Social ads are images and video that must stop a scroll in the first seconds and carry the offer without a search to lean on. A business with strong visuals or a product people understand on sight has an advantage on social; a business selling something people already look for has an advantage in search.

Which to start with

A simple rule of thumb, adjusted to your own numbers:

  • Start with Google Ads if people search for your product or service by name or need, you can serve leads quickly, and each sale is worth enough to pay search prices.
  • Start with Facebook ads if people do not search for what you sell yet, the product sells on sight, or you need volume at a lower cost per lead.
  • Run both once one channel is profitable: search to capture demand, social to create it and to retarget site visitors.

Conclusion

Google Ads captures demand people already have; Facebook ads create it. Public benchmarks put Facebook's median cost per lead at $27.66 (US, April 2024 to June 2025) against $66.69 for search ads (April 2025 to March 2026), but search leads usually carry more intent, so compare both on cost per qualified lead from your own records. Start where your buyers already are, then add the other channel once the first is profitable.

PromotEdge International is an international strategy, technology, marketing and design company, and our delivery team is in India. Our paid social campaigns and performance marketing run Meta and Google against one cost per lead, in ad accounts that stay in your name.

Facts we rely on: see our company facts for what we state about ourselves and where each fact comes from.

Common questions

  • Per click and per lead, usually yes. WordStream's 2025 Facebook benchmarks put the median lead at $27.66 (US, April 2024 to June 2025), and its 2026 search report averages $66.69 per lead. Search leads often carry more intent, so compare cost per qualified lead from your own CRM before deciding.

  • Search leads usually arrive with more intent, because the person was looking for what you sell. Facebook leads can be good when the offer and audience are well chosen, but more of them need nurturing. Measure qualified leads and closed sales per channel in your CRM, not form fills.

  • Start with Google if people search for what you sell and each sale can pay search prices; start with Facebook if they do not search for it yet or the product sells on sight. Add the second channel once the first is profitable, using social to retarget people who visited from search.

  • Yes, and many businesses do. Search captures people ready to buy, social creates demand and retargets site visitors who did not convert. Track both against one number, such as cost per qualified lead, so budget moves to whichever channel delivers it at the time.

  • Bids and competition for the audience or keyword, plus relevance. Google counts landing page experience in Quality Score; Meta's auction combines the bid with estimated action rates and ad quality. Relevant ads and fast, clear landing pages lower cost on both platforms.

  • Yes. Our paid social and performance marketing teams run Meta and Google campaigns against one cost per lead, in ad accounts that stay in your name, with tracking to your CRM. We quote after reviewing your goals and past results, and publish no rate card.

Brands we have worked with

  • Fine Organics
  • Weichai
  • Novozymes
  • Dozco
  • SANY
  • Prezent
  • Honest AI
  • SCENNE
  • Sara International
  • Vega MPS
  • Desi Machine Pvt. Ltd.

Work delivered from India. Results are shared one to one, under NDA.

See all clients

Talk to us

Tell us what you need

We use these details only to reply to you.

Phone or WhatsApp (optional)
Who is it for? (optional)

Rather talk now?

How we work

  1. 01

    Tell us the goal

    A rough note through the form on what you sell and what needs to change.

  2. 02

    We study your market

    How people find you today, where inquiries get lost, then a call in your working day.

  3. 03

    A written plan

    The work, who does it and how it is measured. Nothing starts until you approve it.

  4. 04

    The work starts

    Our team in India does the work, with calls set in your working hours.

  5. 05

    Reports and visits

    Every number we report shows its source and date range, and we travel to our clients every 3 to 4 months.

Chat with us